Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
Transcript of Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
1/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
2/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
3/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
4/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
5/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
6/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
7/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
8/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
9/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
10/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
11/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
12/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
13/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
14/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
15/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
16/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
17/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
18/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
19/26
*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
20/26
PEPERIKSAAN PERCUBAAN
PENILAIAN MENENGAH RENDAH 2011
_____________________________________________
MARK SCHEME
BAHASA INGGERIS
KERTAS 1 DAN 2
__________________________________________________
1
SULIT
AUG
2011
j*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
21/26
2
Method of determining the overall result:
Paper 1 - 40 marks
Paper 2 - 50 marks_______________
Total marks - 90 marks________________
Convert the total marks into percentage as below:
Candidates marks ___________________ X 100 = _________ %
90
j*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
22/26
3
PAPER 1
1 C
2 D
3 D
4 B
5 C
6 B
7 B
8 D
9 D
10 C
11 B
12 D
13 A
14 C
15 B
16 A
17 B
18 A
19 D
20 A
21 B
22 C
23 A
24 C
25 A
26 C
27 A
28 B
29 D
30 A
31 B
32 D
33 B
34 C
35 C
36 A
37 D
38 C
39 A
40 D
j*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
23/26
PAPER 2
MARKING CRITERIA FOR SECTION A GUIDED WRITING BAND DESCRIPTORS
BAND MARKS DESCRIPTORS
EXCELLENT 25-30x Task fulfilled with ideas and details well-developed and
well-organised.
x Language is accurate with few minor errors and first draftslips.
x Varied sentence structures are used effectively toconvey meaning.
x Vocabulary is apt and widely used.
x Accurate use of mechanics of writing.
x Interest of the reader is aroused and sustained.
CREDIT 19-24x Task fulfilled with ideas and details developed and
organised.
x Language is largely accurate with some serious andminor errors.
x Simple and compound sentence structures are accurate.
x Vocabulary is wide enough but lacks precision.
x Almost always accurate use of spelling, punctuation andparagraphing.
x Interest of the reader is aroused but not sustained.
ACHIEVEMENT 13-18x Task fulfilled with ability to develop some ideas but lacks
details, ideas adequately organised.
x Language is sufficiently accurate with frequent seriouserrors.
x Simple and compound sentence structures areattempted.
x Vocabulary is sufficient to convey meaning.
x Some errors in mechanics of writing.
WEAK 7-12x Task partially fulfilled with ideas less developed; ideas
lacking organisation.
x Language barely accurate with frequent serious errorsthat hamper reading.
x Vocabulary is limited.
x Serious errors in mechanics of writing.
VERY WEAK 1-6x Task hardly fulfilled: ideas lack cohesion.
x High density of errors; meaning is hardly conveyed.
j*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
24/26
SECTION B: SUMMARY
Content : 5 marks
Language : 5 marks
Total : 10 marks
CONTENT POINTS FOR SUMMARY
1. natural remedy for illnesses / fatigue
2. to reduce cholesterol
3. helps to reduce weight
4. dissolve unwanted fats
5. converts fats into energy
6. treating diabetes
7. treating heart disease(s)8. helps in digestion
*Key words taken from the text must be spelt correctly to merit a content point. The
key words are underlined.
*Award a maximum of 5 marks for any 5 content points
j*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
25/26
MARKING CRITERIA FOR SUMMARY LANGUAGE BAND DESCRIPTORS
BAND MARKS DESCRIPTORS
EXCELLENT 5 x Marked ability to use own words
x Language is accurate- use of simple and compound sentences- appropriate linkers- use of correct grammar
x Accurate spelling and punctuation
x First draft slips
x No lifting of sentences
x No irrelevant details
CREDIT 4 x Ability to use own wordsx Language largely accurate
- use of simple and compound sentences- appropriate linkers- use of correct grammar
x Spelling and punctuation largely accurate
x Some minor errors
x Almost no lifting of sentences
x No irrelevant details
ACHIEVEMENT 3 x Attempts to use own words
x Language sufficiently accurate- use of simple and compound sentences(majority of simple sentences)
- some use of linkers- some serious grammatical errors
x Some serious errors in spelling and punctuation
x Selective lifting of sentences
x Some irrelevant details
WEAK 2 x No attempts to use own words
x
Frequent serious errors in grammar, spelling andpunctuation
x Linkers hardly used
x Wholesale lifting of text material
x Irrelevant details
VERY WEAK 1 x High density of errors fractured syntax
x Total lifting of text material i.e transcript
x Irrelevant details
j*k
-
8/4/2019 Pmr Trial 2011 Bi Q&A (Kedah)
26/26
7
MARKING CRITERIA FOR SECTION C NOVEL BAND DESCRIPTORS
BAND MARKS DESCRIPTORS
EXCELLENT 9-10 x Requirements of task fulfilledx Ideas and details well-developed, well-organised with
evidence from text
x Varied sentence structures (simple and compound)
x Wide and apt vocabulary
x Accurate use of language
x Accurate mechanics of writing
CREDIT 7-8 x Requirements of task fulfilledx Ideas and details largely developed, organised and supported
with evidence from text
x Varied sentence structures (simple and compound)
x Vocabulary wide enough
x Largely accurate use of language
x Largely accurate mechanics of writing
ACHIEVEMENT 5-6 x Requirements of task fulfilledx Ideas and details sufficiently developed with some
organisation and supported with some evidence from text
x Sentence structures lack variety (simple structures
x dominate)
x Adequate vocabulary usedx Sufficiently accurate use of language
x Fairly accurate mechanics of writing
WEAK 3-4 x Requirements of task partially fulfilledx Ideas lack development and organisation with minimal textual
support mere narration
x Sentence structures mostly simple with errors that hamperreading
x Vocabulary limited
x Language barely accurate with errors that hamper reading
x Inconsistent mechanics of writing
VERY WEAK 1-2 x Requirements of task hardly fulfilledx Hardly any development of relevant ideas or textual support
x High density of errors; blurring evident, lacks cohesion
x Vocabulary very limited
x Numerous errors in mechanics of writing
j*k