20140331-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Datuk Seri Najib Razak Prime Minister of Malaysia & Mr Tony...

8/12/2019 20140331-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Datuk Seri Najib Razak Prime Minister of Malaysia & Mr Tony Abbott PM

1/4

p1 31-3-2014

INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD

A 1stedition limited special numbered book on Data DVDISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0

PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI seriesby making a reservation, See also

Http://www.schorel-hlavka.com Blog atHttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, Malaysia 31-3-2014Email:[email protected]

5Cc: Datuk Azharuddin Abdul Rahman (DCA) director-general

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AVIATION, MALAYSIA

No. 27 Persiaran Perdana Aras 1-4 Blok Podium, 62618 Putrajaya

Tel : +60388714000 Fax : 603 - 8890 1640 Email :[email protected]

Mr Tony Abbott MP(Commonwealth of Australia) [email protected]: 20140331-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Datuk Seri Najib Razak Prime Minister of Malaysia &

Mr Tony Abbott PM- Re: MISSING PLANESir,15

it is regrettable that already it has been accepted by authorities that MH370 has crashed and

all aboard are dead when I view there still is not a shred of evidence (at least not known to me at

time of writing) that this actually eventuated as such.

In my view, the first thing that should be done is a re-enactment of the flight, as set out below.

20

In my view, what should be done is to re-constitute the flight conditions that existed with flight

MH370 and take to the sky. Then the same known conduct such as switching of the responder,

etc, should be done. The same known route (or approximate route) then should be pursued back

over Indonesia and then try to do the flight in the direction of what is assumed the path near

Western Australia, only to obviously safely land the plane at Perth.25What this would or could establish if the pings of the 777 used for this experiment will show the

same movements as the missing MH370. Obviously one cannot afford killing passengers for

such an experiment and so dummies are to be used or people fitted with air bottles more than

sufficient to last them throughout the time of needing additional air supplies.

The plane should have air pressure gauges fitted to measure the air presser conditions during the30

flight. And also ion the cockpit to measure it there.

What is essential to establish is the time sequences of the pings and possible locations where

each ping (from the engines) was located. It may mean that a certain long stretch or short stretch

may be noticed that may explain the plane having landed somewhere, refuelled and then taken to

the air again. Even if the passengers mobiles were all removed it may be that whomever was35

flying MH370 may still have had a mobile phone on him/her that may have emitted signals, afterit reached 45,000 feet, etc.

One has to consider that flying a plane with a pilot and co-pilot then unless the pilot was out of

the cockpit and locked out by the co-pilot, the pilot easily would have had time to use his own

mobile or that of a passenger or cabin crew member to make a call out. After all not until the40

pilot would have lost conscious (say at reaching 45,000 feet) and not trying to use any air mask

that are provided in planes, there still should have been ample of time for the pilot to warn of a

hijack by the co-pilot.

If therefore the locking out of the pilot is not a reasonable option as such then was the pilot killed

before the responder was switched off?45
http://www.schorel-hlavka.com/http://www.schorel-hlavka.com/http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatimailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.schorel-hlavka.com/


2/4

p2 31-3-2014





A voice analyses of the co-pilot All Right, Good Nightworking could be compared with other

of his voice recording to see if it was the same or that there were abnormal pitches in the voice,

etc.

After all if the co-pilot was talking under stress by another person then this may bear out from

comparing different voice recordings.5

In my view a re-enactment of the actual flight should be done and see if the same details will

show up in the satellites and radars. Without forewarning the Malaysian armed forces it might

also be a test to see if they are up to the task of defending Malaysian airspace or yet again ignore

it. However, Indonesia should be warned about it. What this also might enable is to see if

Indonesia and Australia may discover a certain trend of details that when compared with the day10

MH370- disappeared to give a better understanding/perception how to interpret those details.

Obviously the cargo should be mimicked to the same weight, etc. And the same with the

approximate weight of passengers and crew that was on MH370. It could be merely to tie

sandbags on seats to the approximate weight of each passenger.

I have absolutely no flying experiences, other than being flown from The Netherlands to15

Australia but I view a Flight Simulator cannot accurately reproduce the exact weight of the plane,

the conditions in the cabin, etc.

An actual test with flying a real plane with some well-prepared passengers who will see if there

is time to make a call out, such as pre-programmed numbers on a mobile, etc, will give a betterunderstanding of what may have eventuated.20

If such a test were to indicate that the plane didnt move at a constant speed at all but somewhere

near Malaysia/Indonesia seems to have been stationary (landed) then this could throw out

considerably what currently might be estimated to have been the length of the flight path. If the

plane had been unloaded of cargo, passengers and crew then it would obviously have used a lot25

less fuel and could have been flying a lot longer.

During this test flight there should also be a number of mobiles placed in the plane so that it can

be established if they emitted GPS and so where during the flight, etc.

Such a test may possible pose more questions but may also resolve some puzzles of details and30may even alert to the planes movement differently then so far considered.

As such, when the (test0 plane takes off from Kuala Lumpur the question then is how can anyone

being it the pilot/co-pilot or crew member or a passenger prevent anyone to call out using a

mobile and fly the plane as it is assumed it did?35

.

The first thing to consider is how much fuel was there on board of MH370? Was there an extra

load of fuel to enable the plane to travel a greater distance? While it is claimed that the plane

may have used up more fuel by flying at a higher speed., in the end what ought to be considered

is what was the fuel load that was expected to have been still in the plane after its last journey40

and how much was loaded before flying away from Kuala Lumpur?

The next issue is was there any indication that the pilot/co-pilot invited anyone else other than

the crew to join them at the flight deck (cockpit)? As such was there any video recording in the

terminal that indicated some form of association between the pilot/co-pilot and passengers in the45

terminal?

Did any of the crew, other than the pilot/co-pilot, have some training in flying the plane? As the

crew generally has easy access to the cockpit it might be that one of the cabin crew could have

taken charge.50
http://www.schorel-hlavka.com/http://www.schorel-hlavka.com/http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.schorel-hlavka.com/


3/4

p3 31-3-2014





Which mobile phones, if any, were discovered to be on during the flight? Even if it was assumed

that the plane was so to say hijacked, then nevertheless some mobiles would have been working

where not all passengers may have been asleep. Some even perhaps still working on their laptops

to prepare for a meeting later that day, etc. As such, what is needed is a chronology of events

including each and every mobile/laptop/etc, that was recorded by service providers to be emitting5

date to or from the units. Any GPS details. Even if the fact that the plane went to 45,000 feet

high that may have caused most if not all passengers to die within say 9 seconds, some

passengers who may have been awake, and the cabin crew may nevertheless have had time to put

on a mask if the decompression or high flying level was causing problems.

Even if some passengers so to say instantly were rendered unconscious or died but were using a10

mobile at the time then the mobile or other instrument may still have been emitting signals that

were picked up by mobile towers. This means that if at a certain time X some mobiles went off

the air but some were still emitting then it may have been that some passengers stopped

voluntarily to use the mobile or that they simply were rendered inoperative and the mobile may

automatically have switched off if no voice noise continued whereas others may still have been15

going.

GPS of various mobiles may also give indication as to which way a mobile was heading, even if

not being used by passengers. As such, irrespective if passengers were not using mobiles the

GPS will still be emitted. If however all mobiles somehow stopped working about the same timethen it may be that they were collected by some person and then somehow disposed of from the20

airplane in full flight. For this the critical issue is when was the last GPS established and so by

how many of the mobile or other units. Because mobile phones do not stop emitting details

merely because the person using it becomes say unconscious, then clearly they would continue to

remain emitting details. The question is also was there any mobile phone tower that recorded a

call from any of the mobile phones to the outside area. Being it a passenger/crew member25

phoning out to someone on the ground Even if due to the plane flying for an unknown time was

flying at a level that would cause passengers to become unconscious or even die, in particular

those who were asleep and would not have been aware of lack of air, nevertheless the crew

would have been awake and even a single crew member could have moved from the back of the

plane to the front using the air of the mask (that fall down when cabin pressure is too low, and so30made it to the front, where spare air bottles are kept. As such, the crew member could have tried

to text an S.O.S or something to someone that something was amiss with the plane. It appears

therefore to me extra ordinary that not a single crew member could have used a mobile to alarm

authorities or relatives.

35

There may be many theories such as the following:

http://www.legitgov.org/Malaysian-Flight-370-Hijacked-US-Navy-protect-Suspicious-Cargo-

RussiaQUOTE

Malaysian Flight 370 Hijacked by US Navy to protect40

'Suspicious Cargo' - Russia

March 18, 2014 by legi tgov

Malaysian Flight 370 Hijacked by US Navy to protect 'Suspicious Cargo' - Russia15 Mar

2014 A new report circulating in the Kremlin prepared by the Russian Main IntelligenceDirectorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces (GRU) states that Aerospace Defence45Forces (VKO) experts remain "puzzled" as to why the United States Navy "captured and then

diverted" a Malaysia Airlines civilian aircraft from its intended flight-path to their vast andhighly-secretive Indian Ocean base located on the Diego Garcia atoll... Interesting to note, thisreport says, was that Flight 370 was already under GRU "surveillance" after it received a "highlysuspicious" cargo load that had been traced to the Indian Ocean nation Republic of Seychelles,50
http://www.schorel-hlavka.com/http://www.schorel-hlavka.com/http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.legitgov.org/Malaysian-Flight-370-Hijacked-US-Navy-protect-Suspicious-Cargo-Russiahttp://www.legitgov.org/Malaysian-Flight-370-Hijacked-US-Navy-protect-Suspicious-Cargo-Russiahttp://www.legitgov.org/Malaysian-Flight-370-Hijacked-US-Navy-protect-Suspicious-Cargo-Russiahttp://pakistancyberforce.blogspot.com/2014/03/russia-malaysian-flight-370-hijacked-by.htmlhttp://pakistancyberforce.blogspot.com/2014/03/russia-malaysian-flight-370-hijacked-by.htmlhttp://pakistancyberforce.blogspot.com/2014/03/russia-malaysian-flight-370-hijacked-by.htmlhttp://www.legitgov.org/Malaysian-Flight-370-Hijacked-US-Navy-protect-Suspicious-Cargo-Russiahttp://www.legitgov.org/Malaysian-Flight-370-Hijacked-US-Navy-protect-Suspicious-Cargo-Russiahttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.schorel-hlavka.com/


4/4

p4 31-3-2014





and where it had previously been aboard the US-flagged container shipMV Maersk Alabama.What first aroused GRU suspicions regarding the MV Maersk Alabama, this report continues, wasthat within 24-hours of off-loading this "highly suspicious" cargo load bound for Malaysia AirlinesFlight 370, thetwo highly-trained US Navy SEALS assigned to protect it,Mark Daniel Kennedy,43, and Jeffrey Keith Reynolds, 44, were found dead under "suspicious circumstances."5

END QUOTE

The issue is however to try to establish by a re-enactment what might have been occurring during

the flight before it finally crossed Indonesia territory.10

It may very well result that by reenacting the flight a better understanding may emerge as to the

possible location of the plane having crashed into the ocean, if this it did, with or without

passengers/crew/cargo.

Lets not forget we are dealing with peoples lives who may or may not still have survived. We15

can never underestimate the resilience of people and if they are still alive we better not waste any

time not to look for them. Their families have a right we ensure every possibly avenue is being

explored.

As I have stated in the past, unless there are bodies proving they are dead we otherwise cannot20

assume they are!

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.(Friends call me Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL(Our name is our motto!)25
http://www.schorel-hlavka.com/http://www.schorel-hlavka.com/http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Maersk_Alabamahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Maersk_Alabamahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Maersk_Alabamahttp://www.cbsnews.com/news/2-ex-navy-seals-on-maersk-alabama-died-of-respiratory-failure-police-say/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/2-ex-navy-seals-on-maersk-alabama-died-of-respiratory-failure-police-say/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/2-ex-navy-seals-on-maersk-alabama-died-of-respiratory-failure-police-say/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/2-ex-navy-seals-on-maersk-alabama-died-of-respiratory-failure-police-say/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Maersk_Alabamahttp://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikatihttp://www.schorel-hlavka.com/

20140331-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Datuk Seri Najib Razak Prime Minister of Malaysia & Mr Tony...

Documents

Transcript of 20140331-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Datuk Seri Najib Razak Prime Minister of Malaysia & Mr Tony...