Rubrik Laporan Lab 3

download Rubrik Laporan Lab 3

of 2

Transcript of Rubrik Laporan Lab 3

  • 7/30/2019 Rubrik Laporan Lab 3

    1/2

    UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKAFAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN ELEKTRIK

    LABORATORY REPORT RUBRICSBEKU 1221

    Lab 3

    A. Student Details

    Course/Group : Semester/Session :Name A : Matrix No. A :

    Name B : Matrix No. B :

    Name C : Matrix No. C :

    Title : Date :

    B. Report Obtained1.0 Abstract 2

    Abstract is clear and well described. 2 Abstract is not well described. 1

    Abstract is not presented or is plagiarized. 0PartA

    PartB

    PartC

    2.0 Problem Statement 0Problem is well described and the project purpose is clearly explained.Problem is not well described.Problem is not explained or is plagiarized.

    3.0 Objective and Scope 3Clear and realistic objective and scope 1 1 1Either objective or scope is not clear 0.5 0.5 0.5Objective and scope are not explained or are plagiarized. 0 0 0

    4.0 Experiment/Project Background 6Theory presented is clear and complete as to enhance experiment/projectimpact. Sources of information are properly cited. 2 2 2Theory presented is complete and clear. Most sources of information areproperly cited. 1 1 1

    Reader may have a few questions on theory or have to revise the material.Most sources of information are not cited. 0.5 0.5 0.5

    Missing, incomplete or incorrect description of theory. 0 0 05.0 Methodology 3

    Methodology is correct, well described and most details are covered. 1 1 1Methodology is acceptable but some details are missing. 0.5 0.5 0.5

    Methodology is not acceptable. 0 0 06.0 Results 6

    Data are presented clearly in table, graph or any appropriate formats. Resultis fully achieved project objectives. 2 2 2Data are presented clearly in table, graph or any appropriate formats. Resultis partially achieved project objectives. 1 1 1

    Insufficient and poor presentation of data. 0.5 0.5 0.5No results or plagiarized data are presented. 0 0 0

    7.0 Analysis and Discussion 6Sufficient and accurate analysis. Detailed discussion and related to results. 2 2 2Sufficient but few inaccurate analyses. Discussion is related to results 1 1 1Insufficient analysis. Discussion is not related to results. 0.5 0.5 0.5No analysis and discussion. 0 0 0

    8.0 Conclusion and Recommendation 6Clear and complete summarization of experiment/project achievements.

    Clear and realistic recommendations for future works.2 2 2

    Sufficient summarization of experiment/project achievements. Acceptablerecommendations for future works. 1 1 1

    Insufficient summarization of experiment/project achievements. Norecommendations for future works. 0.5 0.5 0.5

    Conclusion and recommendations are not explained. 0 0 0

  • 7/30/2019 Rubrik Laporan Lab 3

    2/2

    9.0 Report Format and Writing Skill 6Report is very clear and sentences easy to understand. Minor grammatical errors. Report is wellstructured and follows standard format. 5 6

    Report is well written but occasionally some points are not easy to understand. Some grammaticalerrors present. Standard format is used. 3 4

    Report is not well written with many grammatical errors and/or standard format is not followed. 1 2Report is too difficult to understand or plagiarized work was presented and/or standard format is notfollowed. 0

    10.0 References 4Good reference sources and follow standard format of referencing. 4

    Acceptable reference sources and follow standard format of referencing. 2 3Poor reference sources and incorrect referencing format. 1No references. 0

    TOTAL 42

    Comment / Suggestion:

    Evaluated by : Signature :

    Date : Official Stamp :